RSS

Buchenwald 88: UPDATE 1

Buchenwald survivors

Survivors. While Hugh and Stephanie are threatening to destroy my Dad’s materials, the remaining survivors are well into their nineties and will soon die.

Bill Quick, Hugh Schwartz, Stephanie Quick  and Janet Linn began an avalanche of FB postings following my post yesterday.

That post apparently hurt because of the importance I place on the  publication of my father’s unique photographic account of Buchenwald.

Bill complained that I was unfair to compare the destruction of my Dad’s photographs to holocaust denial.  

Here is a sample of Bill’s email response:

Your statement at your website “…Hugh and Stephanie are threatening to destroy my Dad’s materials…” is flat-out wrong, totally inappropriate, and vindictive in the extreme.”
As you are very well aware, Stephanie has NEVER EVER threatened to destroy any materials, period. End of statement. Your including her in this lie is beyond the pale.
I insist that you apologize to her, and correct your on-line misstatement immediately. A copy of your apology should be sent to everyone on this distribution list (your lawyer, the estate’s lawyer, your adult children, and the other defendants/representatives in your lawsuit against your sibs, et al.).

 Janet, my brother’s lawyer cum  wife, sent harassing emials to my children threatening that they needed to hire lawyers.   

Hugh himself went on a diatribe, “You are a walking  talking lie. You know full well that I never had any intention of destroying the documents.”  He described me “he is is a vindictive ugly person who gets joy out of dragging this out as long as possible no matter who he hurts — Elena, Janet, even his own kids.” “My father unfortunately was right when he warned me about Stephen.  He is vicious.  I did not believe him at the time, but I have learned my lesson. 

Despite the acrimony, I really tried to see if there was some opening to make peace.  I think Hugh, with neurosis driven fantasies about my father, was beyond hope.

Still, I thought that, if my sister Steph understood exactly what I want to do, she would be supportive.  After all, Bill is formally correct. Steph has never said she wanted the pictures destroyed though her support of Hugh  has had  the same effect and she knows what Hugh has threatened.  I told her that that I know she loved Dad and told Bill I would be willing to talk with her to see what we might be able to do together.

What she was told, in brief, is this:  In order to proceed, we need to have the pictures finally inventoried, preserved and digitized.  

Anyhow, all I got was more hate mail, culminating with my telling them I would not accept any more email.

I am now blocking your mails. 

Hugh is represented and needs to communicate through his attorneys.

Steph seems to just echo Hugh’s hate mail and have no interest in concrete steps.

I really do not want to read more of this.

 The response from Hugh?

Congratulations Bill!  

 

Bill and Steph Quick <[email protected]>

Steven;
At your recent blogpost,Buchenwald 88: UPDATE 1
http://handbill.us/?p=65539

You buried the following as part of your harangue against your sibs and myself:

After all, Bill is formally correct. Steph has never said she wanted the pictures destroyed

Since you are willing to publicize your apology on the Internet, the very least you could do is to apologize directly to her. As you reproduced at this blog,

I insist that you apologize to her, and correct your on-line misstatement immediately. A copy of your apology should be sent to everyone on this distribution list (your lawyer, the estate’s lawyer, your adult children, and the other defendants/representatives in your lawsuit against your sibs, et al.).

Bill

Bill and Steph Quick <[email protected]>

5:35 AM (1 hour ago)

Print all
In new window

Proof that Stephen’s vindictive

If anyone has any lingering thought that Stephen’s behavior is acceptable and not truly nasty and vindictive (to say nothing of being silly and childish), I offer the following evidence. After posting selected portions of the e-mail interchange, together with misleading commentary, at his website at

http://handbill.us/?p=65539
Buchenwald 88: UPDATE 1

he then posted the following links at his website, together with yucky-looking graphics (but no text).

All have “tags” at the bottom of the post that lead to other stories on his website about the person he’s attempting to vilify. Note that Stephen has used misleading dates (in the 1940’s), although all of them were actually posted yesterday.

Linking to other posts about Janet Linn:

http://handbill.us/?p=65563
The Law Tags!
01Jan1942

http://handbill.us/?p=65560
The Law, Tags!
28Jan2015

http://handbill.us/?p=65556
Thug Law! Tags!
03Jan1942

http://handbill.us/?p=65552

Shysters!

03Jan1942

Linking to other posts about William Quick:

http://handbill.us/?p=65549
Wrong Answer! No!
01Jan1942
(misspells William as Willima)http://handbill.us/?p=65547
Nahhh! You are cold!
01Jan1942

 

 

Click here to Reply to all, Reply, or Forward
34.16 GB (35%) of 96 GB used
Last account activity: 1 hour ago

Details

7 more
Bill and Steph Quick
Add to circles
Show details


Comments are closed.