A recent exchange of posts at the UW AAUP listserv illustrates the political castration of the University.
To be honest, I intend to vote for prop one with a large clothespin applied to my nose.
One participant, excited by something he read in the Seattle Times, posted his enthusiasm for proposition 1.
The issue being discussed is the ballot issue called Prop. 1 …. a vote to fund public transit and county roads by a $60 tax on car tabs and a 0.1% increase in sales tax. The issue arose in response to the usual feckless and ineffective Seattle Time editorial which extolls the real need but opposes taxes for much of anything. I guess if you are Ryan Blethen (the current heir publisher Assistant Managing Editor of the Times) there is a free lunch!).
The enthusiasm on campus is because so many students use the buses. It would be a lot easier to accept this enthusiasm if the UW provided numbers on how the cuts planned in county services will effect the students, faculty and staff who commute this way to campus now. The apparent lack of such number reflects the UW policy of not using state resources to influence ballot issues. Apparently ignorance is OK under state law while knowledge of the fact behind ballot issues is not.
The enthusiasm of the few folks who posted on the listserv would also mean more if there was some reason to believe their enthusiasm for local politics went beyond the limited number of folks who read a list restricted to campus subscribers.
To be honest, I intend to vote for prop one with a large clothespin applied to my nose. I will vote for it because we need public transit, not just for the UW but to service all the new towers with their condos, apartments, and crammed podments. I will need the clothespin because as far as I can see the developers of this new housing, some of it more like traditional dorms than like apartments, are not being asked to pay anything for the costs their housing is creating for Seattle.
To complicate matters, this money is coming out of the tax payers’ pockets while, at least in Seattle, developers have been getting a free ride … cutting the number of parking spaces and not replacing them with fees to support the infrastructure to go with the new towers erupting in Seattle. I also see this as complicated as na UW issue because it conflates the very clear need for public transit with the very different issue of maintaining roads in rural King County.
These are not large taxes. If we assume that the average person spends $12,000 a month on sales taxed items then the total fee is $72. The real problem is that running this tax this way means we are in danger of running into the Eyman limits and not being able to fund other high priority issues such as support for the parks system and pre K.
Read the ballot issue below:
|