JERUSALEM, Huff Post — A slew of Palestinian officials reacted with dismay Saturday to Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich’s statement that the Palestinians are an “invented” people.
Gingrich is an immoral, self serving poseur but he is right this time. There is no historical basis for a country called Palestine. What the professed historian fails to say is that there is also no historical Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Nigeria, South Africa, or ... California. The history is this: Prior to 1948 the only people who called the3mseves Palestinians were Jews. The Arab opposition ot Israel had no intent of creating a state called Palestine. They wanted the land aws npart of Jordan and Egypt. "Palestine" was a colonial idea from the UN, the US and the UK. However, the Palestinain people today have forged a national identity every bit as strong as the identity of any other nation on Earth. if we follow Gingrich's sophistry, then there is noi historical basis for any American state.
The Jewish Channel, a U.S. cable TV network, released excerpts of the interview on Friday in which the former House speaker said Palestinians were not a people because they never had a state and because they were part of the Ottoman Empire before the British mandate and Israel’s creation.
“Remember, there was no Palestine as a state – (it was) part of the Ottoman Empire. I think we have an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs and historically part of the Arab community and they had the chance to go many places,” Gingrich said, according to a video excerpt posted online.
The Palestinian prime minister, Salam Fayyad, demanded Gingrich “review history.”
Gingrich’s statements struck at the heart of Palestinian sensitivities about the righteousness of their national struggle.
Palestinians never had their own state – they were ruled by the Ottoman Empire for hundreds of years, like most of the Arab world. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed in the aftermath of World War I, the British, then a global colonial power, took control of the area, then known as British Mandate Palestine.
During that time, Jews, Muslims and Christians living on the land were identified as “Palestinian.”
Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi said Gingrich had “lost touch with reality.” She said his statements were “a cheap way to win (the) pro-Israel vote.”
A spokesman for the militant Hamas rulers of the Palestinian Gaza Strip called Gingrich’s statements “shameful and disgraceful.”
“These statements … show genuine hostility toward Palestinians,” said spokesman Fawzi Barhoum.
Palestinians bristle at the implication that they were generic Arabs with no specific attachment to the land that Zionist Jews coveted. Using the word “Palestinians” is a way for them to emphasize their claims.
Palestinians are culturally Arabs – they speak Arabic and their culture is broadly shared by other Arabs who live in the eastern Mediterranean.
But they, for the most part, identify themselves as Palestinians, just as the Lebanese, Jordanians and Syrians also identify themselves with a specific national identity.
For Palestinians, their identity was hewed over decades of fighting against another nationalist struggle over the same land – that of Zionist Jews.
During the war surrounding the Jewish state’s creation in 1948, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled, or were forced to flee their homes.
Gingrich’s reasoning was popular in the decades following Israel’s creation, although that argument has since fallen out of favor among mainstream Israelis.
Israeli officials were not immediately available for comment on the Jewish Sabbath.
Funny thing, however: there was no “Palestinian” “outrage” when PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein said this in 1977:
“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.
For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”
GOOD QUOTE>
The Palestinians as a nationality are relatively recent, certainly post 76. BUT, that doe snot mean they are not now a people. They have as much claim to being a people as the Jordanians, Iraqis, or Lebanese .. all created after Turkey’s fall. Same holds for other post colonial nationalities … Pakistan, Indonesia ………………